nagios-nrpe role does not define it's own sudo rights #49

Closed
Ghost wants to merge 2 commits from nagios-sudoers into unstable
First-time contributor

The nagios-nrpe role does not depend on the evolix-users role but
the sudo privileges the role requires to function are in the evolix-users
sudoers template.

I think it would be a better idea if the nagios role defined these privileges itself instead. So I created another sudoers.d file.

The nagios-nrpe role does not depend on the evolix-users role but the sudo privileges the role requires to function are in the evolix-users sudoers template. I think it would be a better idea if the nagios role defined these privileges itself instead. So I created another sudoers.d file.
jlecour was assigned by Ghost 2019-05-28 23:11:26 +02:00
lpoujol was assigned by Ghost 2019-05-28 23:11:29 +02:00
Ghost added the
bug
label 2019-05-28 23:12:56 +02:00
Ghost changed title from nagios-sudoers to nagios-nrpe role does not define it's own sudo rights 2019-05-28 23:14:33 +02:00
Contributor

LGTM.

LGTM.
Owner

I think we should do this for Buster ans later, otherwise we'll have a lot of Stretch/Jessie servers with inconsistent configurations.

I think we should do this for Buster ans later, otherwise we'll have a lot of Stretch/Jessie servers with inconsistent configurations.
benpro added this to the Debian 11 (Buster) milestone 2019-05-31 10:11:21 +02:00
Author
First-time contributor

Subsumed by #77

Subsumed by #77
Ghost closed this pull request 2019-08-06 21:09:55 +02:00

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: evolix/ansible-roles#49
No description provided.